October 10, 2014
The new alimony statute in NJ has widespread consequences for pending divorces. Here are 5 things you need to know about it.
1. There is no longer any “permanent” alimony. Previously, there was a presumption that alimony was going to continue until death, remarriage of the recipient or significant changed circumstances. The word “permanent” has been replaced by “open durational” alimony and the presumption is that all alimony ends when the payor reaches his or her full Social Security age.
2. Alimony cannot exceed the length of the marriage in marriages of less than 20 years. Previously, even in short term marriages, the court could (and sometimes did) make lengthy or permanent alimony awards.
3. The new alimony statute is NOT retroactive. If you are already divorced or have signed a settlement agreement, the terms to which you agreed or were ordered by a court will control. If your Judgment allows for modification of alimony, however, the court may consider full social security age as a reasonable retirement age to end alimony.
4. Loss of employment for 90 days is sufficient to apply to reduce or terminate alimony. Previously, courts required a showing that a loss of employment was a permanent change of circumstances. The length of time that a payor needed to be out of work to meet this burden of proof was unclear.
5. “Cohabitation” no longer requires actual living together as a basis to reduce or terminate alimony. Instead, the court requires only a “mutually supportive, intimate, personal relationship” with “duties and privileges that are commonly associated with marriage.”
The new Statute provides a long list of factors for the court to consider in determining or modifying alimony. As the new law has not yet been tested in court decisions, its ultimate application is yet to be determined. But it is clear that, overall, alimony will be of shorter duration and will likely not go beyond the payor’s full Social Security retirement age, except in unusual cases.
For more information, contact Risa A. Kleiner, Esq. at 609.951.2222 or by email at firstname.lastname@example.org reading
July 28, 2014
Dividing assets in a divorce can be easy (you take your car, I’ll take mine) or difficult (I want part of your 401k, but you can’t have any of my pension). In NJ, the courts apply a list of factors to decide which asset each party receives. While 50/50 is not a hard and fast rule, it is the most common division of most assets.
Courts view retirement assets in the same way they view bank accounts, cars, houses and furniture. If the asset was acquired during the marriage, each party is entitled to receive part of it in a divorce. And that part is usually half.
There is something personal about pensions and 401ks and IRAs. Parties tend to feel that, if they had to get up every day and go to work to earn it, they should be able to keep it in a divorce. Especially if they didn’t want the divorce in the first place. But unless there is another asset to trade off against it, most pensions, IRAs, 401ks, 403bs and other retirement plans will be equalized in divorce.
The division of tax-deferred assets is exempt from income taxes when it occurs as part of a divorce. A special Order, known as a Qualified Domestic Relations Order (QDRO), can be drafted to divide qualified plans such as 401k accounts and pensions. IRAs can be divided with a simple Transfer Order. Funds can be rolled over from one party’s tax-deferred account to the other party’s tax-deferred account — all without tax penalties. Pensions (whether or not vested) can also be divided by QDRO with payments divided as directed when the pension-holder retires.
It is always wise to consult a family law attorney for advice on your specific case. Gather plan documents in advance to make the meeting worthwhile. Mediators and financial planners can also provide guidance in dividing these assets.
For more information on mediation and collaborative divorce, contact Risa A. Kleiner, Esq. at 609.951.2222 or by email at email@example.com reading
March 11, 2014
Every divorce involves a division of the family assets and debts. How this division occurs will affect the future of both parties and their children. So it is critical that both parties fully understand the consequences of their financial decisions. How can you best address these issues?
In the Collaborative process, a trained financial neutral is brought to the Team to assist the parties in reviewing their finances. Both parties will share all their financial information and will provide information on their joint expenses. The expert will provide various scenarios for distribution of assets and debts. This will take into consideration the needs, goals and interests of each party. Tax consequences will also be considered. Armed with full knowledge of the family investments and property, as well as the debts, the parties will be in a strong position to make decisions concerning their financial future.
In mediation, the parties are urged to meet privately with a joint financial expert or to consult individual advisors. Again, it is critical that the parties share all of their financial information, including investments, property values, college and retirement savings and debts. They are encouraged to prepare budgets that reflect the marital expenses and their individual expenses going forward. This will allow the financial expert to assist in recommending options for the division of assets and for alimony and child support, if applicable.
When one or more parties owns all or part of a business, the financial expert is essential in determining the value of the business and its cash flow. The cost often keeps couples from having this done, but doing so avoids inequitable distribution of assets and possible future litigation.
Mediators, even attorney-mediators, are not qualified to provide the financial information that CPAs or CFPs can provide. Their input assists the attorneys, the mediators and the clients.
For more information on mediation and Collaborative Practice, contact Risa A. Kleiner, Esq. at 609.951.2222 or by email at firstname.lastname@example.org reading
February 24, 2014
New Jersey has presumptive Guidelines for child support in a divorce. The Guidelines are used if the combined net family income is $187,200 or less and the children are under 18 years of age or over 18 and living at home while attending college. Good cause must be shown for a court to deviate from the Guidelines, but parties who mediate their divorce or resolve the issues through negotiation can agree to an amount which is different from the Guidelines.
The cost of health insurance for the children is included in the child support calculation so that it can be allocated between the parties. The cost of work-related childcare for the Primary Parent may be included in the calculation or it may be allocated separately. Because childcare costs often vary from year to year, many parents opt to handle this cost separately.
To start the Guidelines calculation, you need to know the annual gross income for each party, the amount of any mandatory deductions (such as union dues) and the amount of alimony, if any, that will be paid and received. The program automatically calculates the anticipated federal and NJ income taxes and arrives at a net annual income for each party. The total estimated cost to cover a child’s share of the shelter, food, clothing and personal expenses is then automatically calculated and allocated proportionally between the parents.
The Parent of Alternate Residence (previously known as the Non-custodial parent) pays his or her share of the child support to the Primary Residential parent. While the Primary parent does not “pay” child support, it is assumed that his or her share of this cost is being spent for the benefit of the children when their mortgage, taxes, insurance, food, clothing, etc. are paid for. Some expenses, such as private school, camp and larger activity fees are often shared and paid separately from child support.
Child support can be paid directly or through the Probation department of the court in the county in which the divorce is venued. If paid through the court, parents have online access to their account and can track their payments. A wage garnishment may also be requested to insure payment. Probation will automatically enter a Judgment if any arrears accrue and will initiate enforcement proceedings upon request.
For further information, contact Risa A. Kleiner, Esq. at 609.951.2222 or by email at email@example.com reading
October 7, 2013
If your answer to the following 10 questions is “yes”, mediation is a good option to resolve your divorce issues.
1. Do my spouse and I want an amicable divorce?
2. Is my marriage free of domestic violence?
3. Can my spouse and I sit across from each other at a table and talk civilly with the mediator and each other about our divorce issues?
4. Do my spouse and I want to resolve our issues without going to court?
5. Do we want to protect our children from a protracted and adversarial divorce?
6. Do we want to move through the divorce process relatively quickly and keep fees to a minimum?
7. Do we want to keep our discussions private and confidential?
8. Are we willing to be transparent and provide all our financial documents to the mediator and each other?
9. Do we understand that the Mediator will prepare a Memorandum of Understanding, but that nothing is final until we have signed a Settlement Agreement?
10. Do we understand that the mediator can provide options and alternatives but cannot provide individual legal advice? (Individual legal consults are recommended for each party before the Agreement is finalized.)
If you answered “yes” to all the above, mediation is a good option for you. Feel free to review my website www.rkleinerlaw.com, call Risa A. Kleiner, Esq. at 609.951.2222 or email her at firstname.lastname@example.org for more information.
September 23, 2013
Many parents open an UTMA account for their child with the intent of saving for college. Is this the best way to go?
The UTMA is opened in the child’s name under the child’s social security number. Many parents do not realize that the deposits into an UTMA constitute an irrevocable gift to the child. Once funds are deposited into the account, the money belongs to the child. Although the custodian of the account can select and manage the investments, the money no longer belongs to him or her. Withdrawals can be made only for the benefit of the child. More importantly, when the child reaches the age of majority (21 in NJ), the custodian is required to turn over the funds to the child, who can then spend the money any way he or she chooses.
Consulting a financial professional before investing for college will save you from choosing a vehicle that does not meet your goals. 529 Plans may be a better choice. In the meantime, if you have opened an UTMA for your child, professional advice can help you invest the funds wisely.
In a Collaborative or mediated divorce, a neutral financial professional can be consulted by both parties to assist them in making important decisions such as how to invest for their children’s college.
For more information about Collaborative Divorce and mediation, contact Risa A. Kleiner, Esq. at 609-951-2222 or by email at email@example.com reading
August 23, 2013
Splitting the property in a divorce includes figuring out what to do with that timehsare – can it be sold? who will keep it? who will pay the annual fees? who will use it? This is a particular problem if neither party wants to keep it.
Because timeshares have been around since the 1970’s, there are literally hundreds of thousands of units out there. It can be difficult to sell a timeshare since you are competing with new ones offered by developers every year. If, as often happens, neither party wants to keep the timeshare after the divorce, you can contact the place you bought it and find out if they will buy it back. If they agree, it will likely be at a significant discount off the original price. (See Star-Ledger, Business Section, p.1, August 19, 2013.)
You could also try to sell your timeshare through a broker or listing service. But beware of upfront costs with no guarantee of an eventual sale. Walking away from the timeshare is usually not a viable option since the parties signed an initial contract in which they agreed to pay the fees and/or loan costs. Failure to pay could jeopardize your credit. An option of last resort (no pun intended) may also be to deed-back the timeshare to the developer – if they will accept it.
Because all of the above options are tenuous, parties to a divorce often agree to keep the timeshare and use it in alternate years and alternate paying the annual costs. If there is an outstanding loan, the loan payments would also be shared. While this is not a perfect solution, at least both parties (and their children) will be able to use the timeshare until it can be sold.
Please contact Risa A. Kleiner, Esq. at 609.951.2222 or by email at firstname.lastname@example.org or further information on distribution of property and other divorce issues.continue reading
April 23, 2013
The case: Husband died in 2008, leaving a life insurance policy purchased in 1996 with his former wife still listed as beneficiary. Although Husband and ex divorced in 1998 and Husband remarried in 2002, he never changed the beneficiary of his policy. Current wife sued in Virginia where State law automatically revokes a divorced spouse as a life insurance beneficiary in favor of the widow or widower. Lower court awarded the insurance proceeds to the widow, but the Virginia Supreme court reversed. The policy had been obtained through a federal insurance program and the court held that federal law, not state law governs. Benefits therefore reverted to the original beneficiary – – the ex-wife.
Status: This case is now on appeal to the US Supreme Court. Widow is arguing that the State, not the federal government, should govern domestic relations issues. Arguments will be held before the court on April 29, 2013. Look for a decision in the months to come.
Moral: NJ has no law automatically revoking the former spouse as a beneficiary of life insurance or any other accounts. And the moral of the story is clear. Beneficiaries on life insurance policies, financial and retirement accounts should always be updated after a divorce. And a new Will should be drafted. The entry of a divorce should be the catalyst to update your financial life and documents. Otherwise, the intended beneficiary may not receive the funds as intended.
For more information about divorce or to set up a consultation, please contact Risa A. Kleiner, Esq. at 609.951.2222.continue reading
August 17, 2012
There are many reasons why mediation is a great option for resolving divorce issues. Here are a few:
1. Mediation allows you to design a customized settlement that works for you and your family.
2. Mediation is confidential. All discussions take place in the mediator’s office and the mediator can never be called to testify about those discussions.
3. Mediation promotes communication. Talking through divorce issues provides a model for working out issues that may arise after the divorce.
4. Mediation is faster than litigation. The couple sets the schedule and often cases are finished in just a few months.
5. Mediation is cost effective. With no court apperances, no formal discovery and no waiting for court schedules, clients save on their counsel fees.
6. Mediation is guided by a trained mediator — a neutral professional who helps clients by suggesting options, alternatives and solutions.
7. Mediation is voluntary. If, for any reason, the process doesn’t work for you, you can opt out at any time.
8. Mediation encourages both parties to get independent legal advice which helps them negotiate their agreement.
9. Mediation is convenient. Sessions are scheduled with the mediator on your time schedule.
10. Mediation is less stressful. With reduced cost and time, a calmer atmosphere and assistance from a trained mediator, stress is significantly reduced.
To obtain more information or to schedule a mediation session, contact Risa A. Kleiner at her Princeton office at 609.951.2222 or by email at Risa@rkleinerlaw.com.continue reading
July 26, 2012
Seventy-five percent of Americans close to retirement age in 2010 had less than $30,000 in retirement accounts. According to a New York Times Op-Ed piece from July 22, 2012, if you want to maintain your lifestyle after retirement, you will need 20 times the amount of your annual income in addition to your Social Security Income. These figures do not take into account extraordinary healthcare costs or unforeseen financial catastrophes. And they assume you will only live for 20 years after retirement!
Those who divorce are often in even more dire financial straits. The funds they thought they would have to live on in retirement are severely depleted due to the cost of the divorce itself and the fact that assets are divided between the parties in a divorce. Often, those over the normal retirement age must continue to work to supplement their savings. But not everyone has the ability or employment opportunities necessary to create a meaningful income stream after 65.
Late-life divorces are becoming more common. And the financial impact of a divorce can be devastating since there is less time to make up for depleted assets. If a divorce is unavoidable, you need to do everything possible to minimize its costs – both during and after the process. That includes doing your utmost to avoid litigation where the costs are high and the outcome uncertain.
By using mediation or a Collaborative Divorce process, you have an opportunity to resolve financial issues for the benefit of both parties and at a lower cost. By selecting neutral experts, you can avoid paying tens of thousands of dollars for competing opinions and extended testimony. By choosing an out-of-court process, you avoid long delays and the enormous cost of formal discovery. You can benefit from your attorney’s legal advice without having to bear the burdensome cost of court time.
Your goal is to be part of the 52% of Americans who say they will be comfortable in their retirement. Your goal is not to deplete your retirement funds in a divorce.
For more information on Mediation and Collaborative Divorce, contact Risa A. Kleiner, Esq. at 609.951.2222 or email@example.com